◊
Please send additions and corrections to info@defendinghistory.com. Thank you.
◊
NOTE: In the months preceding Prof. Shafir’s untimely death in 2022, he had circulated draft chapters of his major book on these topics. One draft title he was considering: Competitive Martyrdom. The chapters were circulated to DefendingHistory.com as well as to academic colleagues in the field internationally. It is very sincerely hoped that his heirs will not allow this treasure to be lost for future scholarship and study, and that the book will indeed be published at the earliest possible time.
◊
Between Denial and “Comparative Trivialization”: Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe
The Nature of Postcommunist Antisemitism in East Central Europe: Ideology’s Backdoor Return
Conceptualizing Hungarian Negationism in Comparative Perspective: Deflection and Obfuscation
Political Antisemitism in Romania: Hard Data and its Soft Underbelly
A Present Chiaroscuro: Review of Himka & Michlich (eds), Bringing the Dark Past to Light: the Reception of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Europe
Questions and Answers on the Holocaust-Gulag “Comparative Martyrology”
Einmal mehr zu einer Vergangenheit, die nicht vergeht




There is, however, disturbingly, quite a stupendous missing link in this abridged history of Lithuania in the twentieth century. Where had the quarter million Jews (the figure on the eve of the Holocaust) of the country disappeared to “overnight” (as centuries go), during that fateful century? Had there ever been a Jewish minority in Lithuania at all? When I looked at the author’s pedigree, I understood why the Jews had not played any role of significance in his biased dialectical discourse. Joren Vermeersch is a historian (of sorts) and an accomplished author. He is also a representative (stand-in, as we call it) for the Belgian House of Representatives, for the “N-VA.” This is the nationalist Flemish party that has its historical roots in the collaboration with the Nazis during World War II. The party that has systematically fought for an amnesty for Nazi collaborators. The party in which the grandparents or parents of some of the present actual leaders had been condemned by the Belgian State for collaboration with the enemy. Nobody is guilty of sins of their ancestors, but when there is a pattern of such pedigree being considered a great plus for current leadership, and that pedigree is subtly glorified rather than disowned, we have a current moral problem that merits discussion in the public square.




