OPINION | POLITICS OF MEMORY | BELGIUM | LITHUANIA
◊
by Roland Binet (De Panne, Belgium)
◊
In chapter five of his major book on the Holocaust in Lithuania published last year, Professor Saulius Sužiedėlis discusses theatrical productions that Jakob Gens had proposed to introduce into the Vilna Ghetto at the end of 1941. Here are some quotes: “Kruk reacted with disgust (…) Members of the Bund announced a boycott and leaflets were distributed stating “You don’t make theater in a graveyard”.
I do not share the opinion that theatre should not have been played in the ghettos. On the contrary, to me, the sometimes vivid cultural life in the ghettos under Nazi and collaborators’ rule, in all its hues and colors, had undoubtedly been a bonding link, a source of some kind of normalcy and hope for the persecuted Jews, and a necessary psychological rampart against fear, boredom, stress, anguish, that all inhabitants of these hells on earth had to go through during days, weeks, months, sometimes years, perpetually living in the mortal fear for one’s life perhaps extinguished from one moment to the next or after a lengthy walk to a killing pit, naked, alone, forlorn.



There is, however, disturbingly, quite a stupendous missing link in this abridged history of Lithuania in the twentieth century. Where had the quarter million Jews (the figure on the eve of the Holocaust) of the country disappeared to “overnight” (as centuries go), during that fateful century? Had there ever been a Jewish minority in Lithuania at all? When I looked at the author’s pedigree, I understood why the Jews had not played any role of significance in his biased dialectical discourse. Joren Vermeersch is a historian (of sorts) and an accomplished author. He is also a representative (stand-in, as we call it) for the Belgian House of Representatives, for the “N-VA.” This is the nationalist Flemish party that has its historical roots in the collaboration with the Nazis during World War II. The party that has systematically fought for an amnesty for Nazi collaborators. The party in which the grandparents or parents of some of the present actual leaders had been condemned by the Belgian State for collaboration with the enemy. Nobody is guilty of sins of their ancestors, but when there is a pattern of such pedigree being considered a great plus for current leadership, and that pedigree is subtly glorified rather than disowned, we have a current moral problem that merits discussion in the public square.




